五胡政权对儒家文化的认知与接受——以后燕君臣关于儒圣和忠德的讨论为例  

Recognition and Acceptance of Han Culture by Ethnic Minorities in the Period of Five Ethic Groups and Sixteen States——Taking the Discussion of the Sage and Loyalty of Confucianism by Murong Sheng Junchen as an Example

作　　者：桑东辉[1] Sang Donghui

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学哲学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150006

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2022年第2期90-97,共8页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中华民族共同体的伦理认同研究”(20&ZD037);国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“中国传统忠德变迁史研究”(19FZXB026)。

摘　　要：五胡十六国开启了中华民族历史上大迁徙、大碰撞、大融合时期。在这场波澜壮阔的民族融合大潮中,文化的融合是其中主要内容。少数民族统治者在接受儒家文化过程中,有一个认知和接受的过程。这个过程并非一帆风顺、一蹴而就的,有时候也会出现质疑和反思。在慕容氏建立的后燕政权中,就出现过后燕主慕容盛与臣下讨论周公和伊尹等儒家圣人是否忠圣的问题。这一讨论不仅具有现实的政治意义,而且具有深远的文化意义,是魏晋南北朝时期民族融合、文化融合的缩影,体现了文化接受学的规律和特点,反映了少数民族政权对以儒家为主的汉文化的接受是全方位的,不仅局限在器物层面,更包括思想层面和制度层面。通过对慕容盛君臣讨论儒圣和忠德的个案分析,能更明晰地看出伦理认同在中华民族共同体形成的历史过程中所发挥的至关重要的作用。The Sixteen Kingdoms of the Five Ethinic Groups started the great integration of the Chinese nation in history. In this magnificent tide of national integration, the integration of culture and customs is the main content. In the process of accepting the Han culture dominated by Confucianism, ethnic minorities have a process of cognition and acceptance. This process is not smooth sailing, overnight, sometimes there will be doubts and reflections. In the post Yan regime established by Murong’s family, Murong Sheng, the Lord of the post Yan Dynasty, discussed with his subordinates whether the Confucian saints such as Duke Zhou and Yi Yin were loyal to the saints. This discussion is not only of realistic political significance, but also of far-reaching cultural significance. It is the epitome of national integration and cultural integration in the period of Wei, Jin,southern and Northern Dynasties. It embodies the laws and characteristics of cultural reception, and reflects that the acceptance of Han culture by the minority regime is all-round, not only limited to the level of utensils, but also includes the level of ideology and system.

关 键 词：中华民族共同体 五胡十六国 文化融合 儒家伦理 伦理认同 

分 类 号：B822[哲学宗教—伦理学] K238[历史地理—历史学]