论“为己之学”与“价值无涉”两种方法论的伦理取向——一个中西比较的研究视角  

The Ethical Orientation of the Two Methodologies of“Learning for Oneself”and“Value Neutrality”--A Comparative Perspective between East and West

作　　者：尹梦曦 左金磊 Yin Mengxi;Zuo Jinlei(School of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,Beijing,China;School of Marxism,China Youth University of Political Sciences,Beijing,China)

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872 [2]中国青年政治学院马克思主义学院,北京100089

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2022年第2期42-49,共8页Tribune of Social Sciences

摘　　要：不同方法论的背后不同程度地隐含了不同的伦理取向。依据马克斯•韦伯的“价值关联”和“价值无涉”两种方法论原则,对“为己之学”为代表的传统儒家方法论和韦伯提出的“价值中立”两种方法论原则中所包含的价值取向进行对比分析,以期进一步挖掘两种治学方法对善恶本质认识的不同,为区分中西哲学思考模式的不同提供另一个视角的理解。To some extent,different methodologies imply different ethical orientations.Based on Marx Weber’s two methodological principles of“value relevance”and“value neutrality”,this paper discusses the two different value orientations behind two methodologies,traditional Confucianism represented by“learning for oneself”and the“value neutrality”.A comparative analysis of value orientations is carried out in order to further explore the differences in the understanding of the essence of good and evil between the two academic methods,providing a special perspective for the understanding of the differences between Chinese and Western philosophical thinking.

关 键 词：恶 韦伯 方法论 儒家 尼采 

分 类 号：B82-06[哲学宗教—伦理学]