比较教学法在物流管理决策课程中的应用研究——以SMAA-ER方法为例  

Application of Comparative Teaching Method in Logistics Management Decision Making Course——Take SMAA-ER Method as an Example

作　　者：张孝琪[1] 刘志[1] 龚本刚[1] 桂云苗[1] ZHANG Xiao-qi;LIU Zhi;GONG Ben-gang;GUI Yun-miao(School of Economics and Management,Anhui Polytechnic University,Wuhu 241000,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽工程大学经济与管理学院,安徽芜湖241000

出　　处：《物流工程与管理》2022年第3期197-199,共3页Logistics Engineering and Management

基　　金：安徽省教育厅质量工程项目“物流管理专业卓越工程师教育培养计划”(项目编号:2019zyrc057);安徽省教育厅质量工程项目“专业评估背景下工业工程专业创新型人才培养模式及保障机制研究”(2019jyxm1266);安徽省高等学校质量工程项目“新工科背景下工业工程类专业动态评估机制研究”(2018jyxm0196)。

摘　　要：SMAA-ER方法是证据推理方法(ER)的一种拓展方法,能够高效处理不确定环境的决策问题,在经济管理等领域具有较好的适用性。然而与传统的证据推理方法相比,SMAA-ER方法的模型和程序更为复杂,学生往往很难快速和准确地掌握其原理。为此,文中从优点和缺点、模型、伪代码以及案例四个方面对两种方法进行比较分析,促进学生对SMAA-ER方法原理的理解和运用。The stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis( SMAA) – evidential reasoning( ER) method is an extended method of evidence reasoning,which can efficiently deal with decision-making problems in uncertain environments and has good applicability in the field of economic management. However,compared with the traditional method of evidence reasoning,the model and procedure of SMAA-ER method are more complicated,and it is often difficult for students to grasp the principle quickly and accurately. Therefore,this paper compares the two methods from four aspects of advantages and disadvantages,models,pseudocode and cases,so as to promote students’ understanding and application of the principle of SMAA-ER method.

关 键 词：SMAA-ER方法 比较教学法 教学探讨 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]