检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨洋[1] 苏莹莹 李仲秋 刘宝巍[1] Yang Yang;Su Yingying;Li Zhongqiu;Liu Baowei(School of Economics and Management,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150000)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学经济与管理学院,哈尔滨150000
出 处:《管理评论》2022年第1期191-204,共14页Management Review
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71872058,71372089);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(HIT.HSS.201842)。
摘 要:员工工作投入一直是管理领域的研究重点,其会受到多种因素的影响,包括未来工作自我、感知组织支持等。但是这些因素是如何组合导致工作投入的呢?这是近年来研究者和管理者比较关注的问题。本文在文献研究的基础上,通过问卷调查收集数据,并采用模糊集定性比较分析方法对影响工作投入的因素进行整合性分析。最终得出六条等效路径,并按照核心条件分为三类:对主动性人格的员工,企业可以通过塑造清晰的未来工作自我来提高工作投入;对非主动性人格的员工,企业可以通过塑造员工清晰的未来工作自我和共享价值观来刺激工作投入;对于未来工作自我不清晰的员工,企业可以通过塑造共享价值观和满足员工的自我实现需求来提高工作投入。Employees’work engagement has been a research focus in the field of management,and it can be affected by a variety of factors,including future work self,perceived organizational support,etc.But how do these factors jointly lead to work engagement?This is a matter of concern to researchers and managers recently.On the basis of literature research,this paper collects data through questionnaires and uses fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to analyze the factors that influence the work engagement.Finally,this study gets six equivalent configurations,and divides them into three categories:For employees with proactive personality,enterprises can improve their work engagement by shaping salient future work selves;for employees without proactive personality,enterprises can stimulate their work engagement by shaping employees’salient future work selves and shared values;for employees who are not clear about their future work selves,enterprises can improve their engagement by building shared values and meeting employees’self-actualization needs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229