检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘长秋 Liu Changqiu(Marxism School,Shanghai University of Political Science and law,Shanghai 201701,China)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院马克思主义学院,上海201701
出 处:《科技与法律(中英文)》2022年第2期45-53,共9页Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
基 金:国家社科重大项目“我国转基因食品规制法律体系构建研究”(18ZDA147)。
摘 要:转基因生物技术发展及其应用所潜藏的风险对法律介入规制该技术提出了挑战,而刑法介入则是题中之义。刑法介入转基因生物技术规制是风险社会中刑法的使命担当,也是弥补现有其他制度手段不足的必然选择。刑法介入转基因生物技术规制并不违背刑法谦抑。目前来看,部分国家和地区的刑法已经明确对转基因生物技术进行了规制。我国《刑法修正案(十一)》增加了人体基因科技方面的犯罪,但迄今依旧无专门针对非人体基因科技的犯罪。这已成为刑法在保障我国生物安全方面的一个重大软肋。基于此,需要继续修改和完善现行刑法,增加有关非人体基因科技方面的犯罪及其刑事责任的规定,以应对转基因生物技术尤其是转基因食品技术带来的挑战。The development of genetically modified organism technology and the risks inherent in its application challenge the regulation of this technology by law, and the involvement of criminal law is the implication of this question.The intervention of criminal law into the technical regulation of Genetically Modified Organism is the mission of criminal law in the risk society, and it is also the inevitable choice to make up for the insufficiency of other existing systems.The involvement of Criminal Law in the technical regulation of genetically modified organism does not violate the modesty of criminal law. At present, the Criminal Law of some countries and regions has clearly regulated genetically modified organism technology. China’s Criminal Law does not yet have any charges against genetically modified organism technology, which has become a major weakness in the protection of China’s biological security. Therefore, it is necessary to continue to revise and improve the current criminal law, and to add the provisions on genetically modified organism and its criminal responsibility, so as to meet the challenges brought by genetically modified organism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147