我国拟制自认制度的反思与完善——基于新《民事证据规定》第四条的思考  

The Reflection and Refinement on the Quasi Self Admission:Based on Article 4 of“the Revised Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceeding”

作　　者：李雨桐 谢文哲[1] LI Yu-tong;XIE Wen-zhe(East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《金陵科技学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期37-41,49,共6页Journal of Jinling Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：新《民事证据规定》对自认制度进行了完善,但对拟制自认制度没有细致的规定,在司法实践中存在民事诉讼模式转型尚未完成、拟制自认类型单一、适用场域不明确、法官释明无严格限制等问题。因此,应结合现有诉讼制度和司法实际,在借鉴域外相关立法优势的基础上完善我国的拟制自认制度。“The Revised Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings”has refined the civil self-admission,but there are no detailed provisions on the quasi self admission system.In judicial practice there exist the following problems:the transformation of civil litigation procedure model is not completed;the quasi self admission allowed in China's law system is single and simplex;the applied situations are not clearly defined;the interpretation of judges is not strictly limited,and so on.Therefore,the paper suggests that combing the current civil procedure system with the judicial practice in China and referring to the superiority of the relevant extraterritorial legislations can better refine the quasi self admission system in China.

关 键 词：拟制自认 自认制度 新《民事证据规定》 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]