检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钱初熹 QIAN Chuxi(College of Fine Arts,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062,China)
出 处:《全球教育展望》2022年第2期15-24,共10页Global Education
基 金:国家社会科学基金全国教育科学“十三五”规划国家一般课题“基于可视化大数据分析的中小学中国画教学评价体系建构研究”(项目编号:BLA170231)的研究成果之一。
摘 要:本文围绕我国教育部启动2021年版义务教育艺术课程标准修订中产生的争论,从历史研究二个向度的意义出发进行思辨。本文对美术教育历史演变的轨迹以及多元化的艺术教育观点展开探究,从中受到启发;对艺术各门类课程的边界进行探讨,提出应当充分发挥“作为创作实践的艺术教育”与“作为审美体验的艺术教育”以及多元化的艺术教育观点各自的优势,避免其局限性。本文在对过去向度进行探讨的基础上,对8个国家现行学校艺术课程的概况进行分析,为解决问题提供参照,并从艺术教育的价值与边界得出两方面的结论,对学校艺术教育的愿景进行展望。This paper focuses on the debate arising from the revision of the art curriculum standard of compulsory education in 2021 edition by the Ministry of Education of China, and makes a speculative discussion from the significance of two aspects of historical research. This paper explores the trajectory of the historical evolution of art education and the diversified views of art education, and gets inspiration from it. This paper probes into the boundaries of all kinds of art courses, and proposes that we should take full advantages of “art education as a creative practice”, “art education as an aesthetic experience” and diversified views of art education, and avoid their limitations. On the basis of discussing the past orientation, this paper analyzes the general situation of school art curriculum in 8 countries, provides reference for solving the problem, and draws two conclusions from the value and boundary of art education, and looks forward to the vision of school art education.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3