检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷丽莉[1] LEI Lili(Department of Journalism and Communication,Dalian University of Technology)
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学新闻传播系
出 处:《国际新闻界》2022年第2期157-176,共20页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“网络安全发展视角下‘平台型’网络运营商法律责任研究”(项目编号:17BXW090)的资助。
摘 要:面部识别技术自2014年以来实现了准确度的大幅提升后,被应用于大量不同的场景。本文分析了面部识别技术对公民权利的影响及在传播语境中的风险。通过对面部信息法律属性的分析,本文认为,相比传统的肖像权,面部识别技术大大改变了面部信息的采集处理对人的权利的影响方式和程度。作为生物识别信息的面部信息不是传统的隐私,也不是一般的个人信息,而是“非隐私个人敏感信息”。本文在介绍国际社会对面部识别技术密集立法的基础上,提出了规制面部信息采集和处理的两项建议,一是公权力和“私权力”对面部信息的采集使用,应遵循不同的规则;二是权利人对面部信息的授权应建立“互动式授权”机制,保证权利人授权的真实性和有效性。Facial recognition technology has been applied to different situations since the accuracy has been greatly improved since 2014.This article analyzes the impact of facial recognition technology on civil rights and the risks in the context of communication.Through the analysis of the legal nature of facial information,this paper believes that compared with traditional right to portrait,facial recognition technology has greatly changed the way and degree of the impact of facial information collection and processing on human rights.Facial image as biometric information is not traditional privacy or general personal information,but “non-private personal sensitive information”.Based on the introduction of global legislations on facial recognition technology,this article puts forward two suggestions for regulating the collection and processing of facial information.One is that different rules should be followed by public power and “private power” in collection and use of facial image.The other is “interactive authorization” mechanism should be adopted in processing facial image,so as to ensure the authenticity and validity of data owners’ authorization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7