“做中国哲学”中的经典与文明——读赵汀阳先生《中国哲学的身份疑案》  

Role of Classics and Civilization in “Do Chinese Philosophy”:A Review of “The Disputed Recognition of Chinese Philosophies” Written by Zhao Tingyang

作　　者：陈壁生 Chen Bisheng

机构地区：[1]清华大学哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2022年第3期74-83,126,共11页Philosophical Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“四书学与中国思想传统研究”(编号15ZDB005)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：赵汀阳的《中国哲学的身份疑案》对当代中西方哲学研究进行了多方面的反思,并基于“第一哲学”的追求,对“中国哲学”的特征进行阐述。其中,赵汀阳对“经学传统”与“心学传统”的批评,事实上是对两种经典观的批评,指向的是当代的经典研究中的问题。对今天“做中国哲学”而言,经典意识与文明意识非常重要,经典意识意味着回到本源性问题,在这一意义上,经典的价值在于提供了基于现实生活经验进行哲学创造的资源。文明意识意味着,在文明立场中保持哲学面向本源问题的普遍主义品质。经典与汉语,构成中国文明的主要形式。也正是在这一意义上,在现代汉语语境中“做哲学”,其表现形式事实上便是“做中国哲学”。“The Disputed Recognition of Chinese Philosophies” by Zhao Tingyang makes several reflections on contemporary Chinese and Western philosophy study and provides a description of the character of Chinese philosophy based on the pursuit of “ the first philosophy”.In his essay,Zhao’s criticism on “ the study of Confucian classics” and “ the philosophy of the mind” is actually criticism on two traditions in Chinese philosophy,which points out problems in current classics study.For contemporary scholars who intend to “Do Chinese Philosophy”,it is essential to call attention to their awareness of classics and civilization.The awareness of classics means to look back on those original questions.In this sense,the value of classics lies in providing resources for philosophy creation which deals with life experience.And the awareness of civilization means to remain the pursuit of universalism in regional civilization study.Chinese classics and Chinese language are the constituent forms of Chinese civilization.Therefore,“Do Philosophy” in the modern Chinese context means to “Do Chinese Philosophy”.

关 键 词：经学传统 中国哲学 本源问题 文明 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]