“心灵赋形”与“挤葡萄汁”--对“杜威-克罗齐之争”的回顾与反思  

“Form Giving in Soul”and“Squeezing Grape Juice”--Review and Reflection on the“Dewey-Croce Debate”

作　　者：王慧婷 黄应全[1] WANG Huiting;HUANG Yingquan(School of Arts,Capital Normal University,Peking 100089,China)

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学文学院,北京100089

出　　处：《浙江海洋大学学报（人文科学版）》2022年第2期24-30,共7页Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humanities Sciences)

基　　金：首都师范大学文学院研究生教育立项及研究生高水平学术创新项目“后期分析美学的艺术观转向及其现实意义”(编号:001-2155081)。

摘　　要：20世纪中叶,杜威和克罗齐进行了一场长达十八年的“错位”攻讦,二人的争论主要集中在三方面:其一,杜威美学是否构成对克罗齐美学的抄袭;其二,谁更像一个黑格尔主义者;其三,谁的思想真正克服了二元论。考察杜威、克罗齐最为相近的“艺术表现论”,可见二人的许多争辩都源自相互误解。尽管二人在强调表现的整体性、创作与欣赏的同一性等问题上有不少相合之处,但无论是理论出发点还是论证思路都南辕北辙。杜威和克罗齐的美学都已超越纯粹的形而上学玄思,走向对人类感性经验的探寻。然而,二人都未真正克服心灵与自然的二元对立,在理论中都还留有“二元论”的残余。In the middle of the 20th century,Dewey and Croce proceeded with a mismatched exposition of each other’s past misdeeds for as long as 18 years.In summary,the two philosophers’arguments focus on the three statements:(1)whether Dewey copied Croce’s views in terms of aesthetics;(2)who is even more like a Hegelian;(3)whose ideas really overcome dualism.Examining the“Artistic Expression Theory”of the two philosophers,many of their arguments stem from mutual misunderstanding.Although the two philosophers have many similarities in such aspects as the emphasis on expressional integrity and the identity of creation and appreciation,both their theoretical starting points and argumentation train of thought are quite different.The aesthetics of both philosophers goes beyond pure metaphysical metaphysics,moving forward to the exploration of the human perceptual experience.However,neither Croce nor Dewey really overcomes the binary opposition between soul and nature,still with the remnants of“dualism”in their theories.

关 键 词：杜威 克罗齐 艺术表现论 情感 

分 类 号：B83-06[哲学宗教—美学]