由凌廷堪礼学、荀学思想看清中期儒学转向  

Study on the Turn of Confucianism in the Mid-Qing Dynasty from Ling Tingkan’s Ritual thought and Xun’s Thought

作　　者：张煜 ZHANG Yu(College of Literature,Liaoning University,Shenyang,Liao ning 110136)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学文学院,辽宁沈阳110136

出　　处：《泰山学院学报》2022年第3期83-88,共6页Journal of Taishan University

摘　　要：戴震等考据学家对明代空谈义理之风不满,率先主张“以情代理”;随后凌廷堪在其基础上提出“以礼代理”,反对舍礼言性,并对尊礼的荀学思想大加赞扬,试图变革空疏学风。荀学本身无论内在理路还是学术气质也都符合乾嘉学人对考据的重视,这些都是荀学在清中期受推崇的原因。总体而言,乾嘉时期礼学与荀学呈现双向互动关系,共同推动儒学向“实”的方向发展。Dai Zhen and other textual scholars were dissatisfied with the empty talk of righteousness and rationality in Ming Dynasty, and took the lead in advocating "representation by affection". Then Ling Tingkan put forward the "representation by etiquette" on the basis of Dai Zhen, and against talking about humanity instead of ritual. They also spoke highly of Xun Zi ideology, trying to reform the study style and replace empty speech with solid knowledge. Xun Zi ideology can meet the needs of scholars in the Mid-Qing Dynasty both in the internal way and in the academic temperament. Therefore Xun Zi had the merit of passing on scriptures, since scholars in Qian Jia period emphasized texturing, then Xun Zi ideology was praised in a natural way. Overall, ritual study and Xun Zi ideology in Qian Jia period presented a two-way interactive relationship.

关 键 词：礼学 荀学 凌廷堪 以礼代理 乾嘉学派 

分 类 号：B249[哲学宗教—中国哲学]