检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐莹[1] 王向阳[1] 李嘉敏 QI Ying;WANG Xiang-yang;LI Jia-min(School of Business and Management,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林大学商学与管理学院,吉林长春130012
出 处:《情报科学》2022年第5期173-179,共7页Information Science
摘 要:【目的/意义】以创新网络为背景,从知识管理视角探究创新网络中企业知识创造模型,为增强知识创造结果提供新视角。【方法/过程】基于对知识类型和知识创造模型文献梳理,通过组织兼容性不同维度对不同知识创造路径分析,构建创新网络中企业知识创造模型,提出保障措施。【结果/结论】组织兼容性是知识创造的重要因素。其中组织兼容性包括文化兼容性、战略兼容性和知识兼容性,知识创造类型涉及管理知识创造、市场知识创造和技术知识创造;创新网络知识创造是通过组织兼容性到知识交换再到知识创造的过程,其中知识交换和知识融合能力对知识创造具有协同作用。【创新/局限】创新性提出创新网络中企业知识创造模型,并详细分析组织兼容性不同维度对不同类型知识创造作用机理。但模型仅限于理论探索,缺少案例和实证量化验证。【Purpose/significance】Based on the context of innovation network,this paper explores the knowledge creation model of innovation network from the perspective of knowledge management,and provides a new perspective for enhancing knowledge creation.【Method/process】Based on the literature review of knowledge types and knowledge creation models,an innovative network knowledge creation model is constructed through the analysis of different knowledge creation paths in different dimensions of inter-organizational compatibility,and guarantee measures are proposed.【Result/conclusion】Inter-organization compatibility is an important factor in knowledge creation.Inter-organizational compatibility includes cultural compatibility,strategic compatibility and knowledge compatibility.The types of knowledge creation involve managerial knowledge creation,marketing knowledge creation and technological knowledge creation;innovation network knowledge creation is through inter-organizational compatibility to knowledge exchange and then to knowledge creation process in which knowledge exchange and knowledge combination capability have a synergistic effect on knowledge creation.【Innovation/limitation】Innovatively proposes an innovative network knowledge creation model,and the mechanism of different dimensions of inter-organizational compatibility on different types of knowledge creation is analyzed in detail.However,the model is limited to theoretical exploration,lacking cases and empirical quantitative verification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.36.242