检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张立新[1] 来钇汝 秦丹 ZHANG Lixin;LAI Yiru;QIN Dan(College of Teacher Education,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China;Office of Research Affairs,Tangshan Normal University,Tangshan 063000,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学教师教育学院,浙江金华321004 [2]唐山师范学院科研处,河北唐山063000
出 处:《开放教育研究》2022年第3期67-72,共6页Open Education Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2020年度教育学一般课题“人工智能技术的教育伦理评估指标体系研究”(BCA200081)。
摘 要:人工智能技术在各领域展现出巨大的实践价值与发展前景,在教育领域却遭遇了巨大阻力,其根源在于当前智能教育领域工具理性和价值理性之间的冲突与博弈。智能教育的工具理性和价值理性之间是辩证统一的矛盾关系,并非不可调和,而是可以通过辩证的方法实现协同统一。智能教育应坚守“培育学生生命自觉”的使命,禁止用技术“神话”催生教育焦虑,尊重教师工作的创造性,防止技术凌驾于教师“主体”之上并把技术的工具属性强行赋予教师。AI technology has shown a tremendous practical value in various fields;however,its application in the educational field has encountered huge resistance and developed slowly.The root of this question is based on the conflict and game between instrumental rationality and value rationality of intelligent education,while the relationship between the two rationality is dialectical and unified rather than irreconcilable,and it could be coordinated through dialectical methods.The instrumental rationality of intelligent education should adhere to the mission of"cultivating students’awareness of life",forbid the educational anxiety caused by"myth"of technology,respect the creativity of teachers’work,and prevent technology from overriding teachers’"subject"and imposing its tool attributes on teachers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117