宋明抑或明清:关于儒学第三期发展学理起点的再思考  

Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties or that in the Ming and Qing Dynasties?:Rethinking the Theoretical Starting Point of the Third Epoch of Confucianism

作　　者：杨泽波[1] YANG Ze-bo

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院,上海200433

出　　处：《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期1-9,184,共10页Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“儒家生生伦理学引论”(项目编号:18AZX013);教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助(重大)项目“儒家生生伦理学研究”(项目编号:16JHQ001)。

摘　　要：宋明儒学对儒家学理有重要推进,也有严重误判,出现了天理实体化、门庭狭窄化、人欲污名化的问题。明清之际,以船山、蕺山、戴震为代表,对这三大误判进行了系统的检讨。但受各种因素的影响,这个进程被打断了,儒学第三期的发展未能接上这个端绪,致使宋明儒学这些问题仍以各种形式残留着,其中尤以天理实体化和门庭狭窄化为甚。儒学今后的发展应该自觉回头补课,接着明清讲,而不是接着宋明讲。这个问题处理不好,将直接影响儒学下一步的发展,需要引起高度关注。Despite its great doctrinal advance,Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties committed some serious misjudgments,including the materialization of heavenly principle,sectarianism,and the stigmatization of human desire.In the Ming and Qing Dynasties,these three major misjudgments were systematically reflected and criticized by WANG Fuzhi,LIU Zongzhou and DAI Zhen.However,this process was interrupted due to political factors,and the development of Confucianism in the third epoch failed to continue such reflection and criticism,with the result that these problems of Confucianism in the Song and Ming Dynasties,especially the materialism of heavenly principle and sectarianism,still linger in various forms.The future development of Confucianism should consciously go back and make up“missed lessons”by following the Ming and Qing Dynasties,rather than the Song and Ming Dynasties.If this issue is not dealt with properly,it will have a direct impact on the next step in the development of Confucianism.Therefore,this issue deserves a great deal of attention.

关 键 词：天理实体化 门庭狭窄化 人欲污名化 补课论 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学] K23[历史地理—历史学]