通史的构造:建筑学专业、学科与知识的形成  

The Formation of General History: The Making of Profession, Discipline and Knowledge of Architecture

作　　者：王为[1,3,4] 夏铸九[2,3,5] WANG Wei;XIA Zhujiu

机构地区：[1]东南大学建筑学院,南京210096 [2]东南大学建筑国际化示范学院,南京210096 [3]东南大学建筑历史与理论研究所,南京210096 [4]城市与建筑遗产保护教育部重点实验室(东南大学),南京210096 [5]台湾大学建筑与城乡研究所,中国台湾台北10617

出　　处：《建筑学报》2022年第5期91-97,共7页Architectural Journal

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(52178035)。

摘　　要：指出“建筑通史”在20世纪晚期之后的发展中所面对问题的根源是处在历史学与建筑学两种知识制度中的,受整合与分散两种不同取向驱使的认识论分歧。进而从范式选择、论证形式、叙事框架等方面,分别讨论了风格史与建造史等基本类型,文化史与全球史等重要路径,以及其中涉及的分类与分期等历史编纂的实践操作。最后,提出一种以理论假说结合经验研究的写作方式,并建议将其视作“建筑通史”这种学科论述体系可能的方法论。This paper argues that the root cause of crisis of “General History of Architecture” since the late 20th century is not a simple shift of research interest from macro history to micro history, but the distinctions in epistemology between two kinds of knowledge institutions of “History” and “Architecture”,driven by different intentions of “integration” and “dispersion”.It then discusses the primary types such as “style history” and “construction history” from the aspects of paradigm selection,formal argument, historiographical framework, etc., and identifies the important approaches such as “cultural history”and “global history”, including some relative historiographical operations such as “classification” and “periodization”. In conclusion, it tentatively proposes a writing methodology based on the theoretical hypothesis combined with empirical research, considering “General History of Architecture” as a disciplinary discourse system.

关 键 词：建筑史 建筑通史 建筑学 历史学 史学理论 

分 类 号：TU-09[建筑科学—建筑理论]