论“弱创造”  

On“Weak Creation”

作　　者：吴炫[1] WU Xuan(School of Humanities,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)

机构地区：[1]上海财经大学人文学院,上海200433

出　　处：《兰州文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第4期18-28,共11页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：“弱创造”来源于中国《易传》“多样统一”“道本器末”哲学思维方法,是对经典之“一”进行时代、个性等差异的学术阐释之“多”。“弱创造”遮蔽了司马迁、苏轼、曹雪芹对儒道哲学批判改造的哲学“强创造”,形成了非哲学批判的中国哲学阐释史。近现代中国学者依附西方哲学思想之所以依然是“弱创造”,是因为“阐释西方哲学”“用西方哲学看问题”不能展开对中西方哲学同时进行的批判创造,“中西融汇”“综合创新”是儒道哲学与西方哲学的观念拼凑,提不出挑战西方哲学问题的中国现代哲学问题。中国现代学者随着时代变化不断修正自己的观念产生的自我变化和自相矛盾,也说明“弱创造”背离了司马迁开创的“天人之际哲学一家之言”之中国学术信仰,这才是中国现代人文社会科学没有自己理论主体性的根本原因。“Weak creation”comes from the philosophical thinking method of“diversity and unity”and“Tao is the root of everything”in Yi Zhuan.It is the academic interpretation of“one”in the classics with different times and personalities.“Weak creation”has covered the philosophical“strong creation”that Sima Qian and Su Shi and Cao Xueqin has criticized and reformed Confucianism and Taoism,and formed the history of Chinese philosophy interpretation of non-philosophical criticism.That modern Chinese scholars are still attaching on western philosophy thought is“weak”,because“the interpretation of the western philosophy”,“viewing problems with western philosophy”cannot carry out the critical creation of Chinese and western philosophy at the same time,“the integration of Chinese and western”,“integrated innovation”are the concept patchwork of Confucianism,Taoism and western philosophy,and cannot put forward Chinese modern philosophy problems that challenge western philosophy problems.The self-change and self-contradiction that Chinese modern scholars constantly revise their own ideas with the changes of the times also show that“weak creation”deviates from the Chinese academic belief of“the philosophy of heaven and man”initiated by Sima Qian,which is the fundamental reason why Chinese modern humanities and social sciences have no theoretical subjectivity of their own.

关 键 词：弱创 创新 道器 阐释 个性 

分 类 号：B83-0[哲学宗教—美学]