从《论语古今注》看丁若镛的实学思想——儒家文献的海外传播与研究举隅  

Jeong Yak-yong's Practical Learning in Ancient and Modern Annotations of The Analects:Examples of Confucian Literature's Overseas Communication and Study

作　　者：刘周霏 LIU Zhoufei(School of Humanities, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学人文学院,上海200240

出　　处：《鲁东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第3期39-46,共8页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“历代儒家石经文献集成”(13&ZD063)。

摘　　要：朝鲜王朝后期,朱子学僵化,代表儒教崭新学风的实学出现,至丁若镛得以集大成。丁若镛的实学思想在解经中主要通过两条路径得以体现,一则对经典原文本身的求证,二则对于经典注解的求证。不同于纯粹的字词考辨之学,丁若镛重视字词训诂的最终要旨仍归于义理,即阐发孔子的孝弟忠恕之道并将之应用于实践。丁若镛的经学折中于汉宋,肯定朱熹以训诂通达义理的释经观念,同时,他也借着对朱熹理学观念的驳斥,建立起自己的实学义理主张。In the later period of the Korean Dynasty,Neo-Confucianism became rigid,while practical learning representing a new style of Confucianism emerged and Jeong Yak-yong epitomized the thought of this school.His practical learning was embodied by way of two routes in the interpretation of the Confucian classics:verification of the classics'original text and annotation.Different from the simple textual research into the words,Jeong Yak-yong stressed that the final aim for the explanations of words was to find the connotations,that is,elucidating Confucius'way of filial piety,loyalty and forgiveness,and applying it to practice.Jeong Yak-yong's Confucianism compromises in the Han's and Song's Confucianism.While he affirmed Zhu Xi's concept of interpreting the classics by explaining the words to understand the connotations,he built his own view of practical learning by refuting Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism.

关 键 词：丁若镛 朱熹 《论语古今注》 实学 义理 

分 类 号：B312[哲学宗教—外国哲学]