检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐知宇 王雁[1] 顾定倩[1] 范文静 XU Zhi-yu;WANG Yan;GU Ding-qian;FAN Wen-jing(School of Special Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875,China)
出 处:《教师教育研究》2022年第3期33-39,共7页Teacher Education Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金“十四五”规划2021年度教育学一般课题(BHA210151)。
摘 要:我国现行的教师资格制度中未设置单独的特殊教育教师资格证书类别,随着特殊教育师资队伍建设改革的深化,当前的特殊教育教师资格认定标准与特殊教育师资队伍建设要求之间的差距愈发明显。本研究在回顾我国特殊教育教师资格政策演变历程的基础上,剖析因缺乏特殊教育教师资格证书而引发的制度、实践矛盾,并提出应对策略。当前迫切需要完善中国特色的教师资格制度,将特殊教育教师作为独立类别的专业人员,单独设置特殊教育教师资格证书类别,制定既能适应特殊教育师资队伍建设需求又能与我国整体的教师制度相适应的资格认定标准。China’s current teacher qualification system does not have a separate category of special education teacher qualification certificates. As the reform of special education teacher construction deepens, the gap between the current special education teacher qualification standards and the requirements of special education teacher construction becomes more obvious. Based on a review of the history of China’s special education teacher qualification policy, this study analyzes the institutional and practical contradictions caused by the lack of special education teacher qualification certificates and proposes strategies to cope with them. It is urgent to improve the teacher qualification system with Chinese characteristics, to set special education teachers as an independent category of professionals, establish a separate category of special education teacher qualifications, and develop qualification standards that can both meet the needs of special education teachers construction and be compatible with the overall teacher qualification system in China.
关 键 词:教师资格制度 特殊教育教师资格证书
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33