扬雄人性论思想辨正——向孔子“性近习远”的回归  

Identify and Correct Yang Xiong’s Theory of Human Nature——Return to Confucius’Theory of Nature-Habit

作　　者：李悦宁 姚春鹏[1] LI Yue-ning;YAO Chun-peng(School of Politics and Public Administration,Qufu Normal University,Rizhao Shandong 276826,China)

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学政治与公共管理学院,山东日照276826

出　　处：《德州学院学报》2022年第3期7-11,共5页Journal of Dezhou University

摘　　要：扬雄在《法言》中提出的“性善恶混”人性论在当时及后世产生了重大影响。通过对扬雄与孔子的人性理论的内涵与本质进行分析可以看出,与其将扬雄人性论看作是孟子性善论和荀子性恶论的综合,不如将其看作是向孔子人性论的回归。扬雄人性论向孔子人性论的回归主要体现在“性善恶混”与“性相近”的内在契合,以及“人性之修”与“习相远”的内在契合两个方面。Yang Xiong put forward the theory of human nature that“The nature is a mixture of good and evil”in Fa Yan,which had a great influence at that time and later generations.After analyzing the connotation and essence of Yang Xiong’s theory of human nature and Confucius’theory of human nature,it can be seen that Yang Xiong’s theory of human nature is more a return to Confucius’s theory of human nature that a combination of Mencius’theory of good nature with Xunzi’s theory of evil nature.The return of Yang Xiong’s theory of human nature to Confucius’theory of human nature is mainly reflected in two aspects:the internal fit of“The nature is a mixture of good and evil”and“similar in nature”and the internal fit of“cultivation of human nature”and“habit separate nature”.

关 键 词：扬雄 人性论 孔子 性近习远 

分 类 号：B234[哲学宗教—中国哲学]