附条件认罪认罚的法理检讨与实践应对  

Theoretical Review of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty with Conditions and the Practical Response

作　　者：闫召华[1] YAN Zhaohua

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《政治与法律》2022年第8期137-150,共14页Political Science and Law

基　　金：重庆市社会科学规划一般项目“认罪认罚案件抗诉标准研究”(项目编号:2021NDYB026);2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“刑事司法中的运动式治理研究”(项目编号:20YJC820058)的研究成果。

摘　　要：附条件认罪认罚是指被追诉人为自己的认罪认罚态度附设一定的前提条件。为认罪认罚附设条件可能会影响认罪认罚的层次或程度,但并不必然妨碍认罪认罚的合法性、适格性。专门机关依然是认罪认罚利益的决定主体,附条件认罪认罚虽然凸显了被追诉人自主性的增强和沟通条件的改善,但并没有从根本上改变专门机关与被追诉人之间听取意见式的关系模式和我国认罪认罚从宽制度职权从宽的本质。为认罪认罚附设条件有可能成为悔罪的否定性表现之一,但附条件认罪认罚也完全可能满足真诚悔罪的要求。面对附条件认罪认罚,专门机关要防止简单拒斥,更要防止过度从宽。Pleading guilty and accepting penalty with conditions means that the accused attaches certain preconditions to his attitude of pleading guilty and accepting penalty,which may affect the level or degree of pleading guilty and accepting penalty,but not necessarily hinder the legitimacy and eligibility of pleading guilty and accepting penalty.Since the specialized organs are still the ultimate determiner of the interests of pleading guilty and accepting penalty,although pleading guilty and accepting penalty with conditions highlights the enhancement of the autonomy of the accused and the improvement of communication conditions,it does not fundamentally change the relationship mode that the specialized organs listen to the opinion of the accused,and the essence of power-determined leniency of the system of giving leniency for pleading guilty and accepting penalty in China.Attaching conditions to pleading guilty and accepting penalty may become one of the negative manifestations of repentance,but pleading guilty and accepting penalty with conditions may also meet the requirements of sincere repentance.In the face of pleading guilty and accepting penalty with conditions,specialized organs should avoid not only simple rejection but also excessive leniency.

关 键 词：附条件认罪认罚 合法性 听取意见 悔罪 从宽 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]