组织公正动态研究述评  

Dynamic Research on Organizational Justice:A Literature Review

作　　者：刘德鹏 高晗 高翔宇 常玥 赵广军 Liu Depeng;Gao Han;Gao Xiangyu;Chang Yue;Zhao Guangjun(School of Management,Shandong University,Jinan 250000,China;Guanghua School of Management,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China;School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China;School of Business,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China;College of Business Administration,Shandong Management University,Jinan 250000,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学管理学院,山东济南250000 [2]北京大学光华管理学院,北京100871 [3]南京大学商学院,江苏南京210093 [4]上海财经大学商学院,上海200433 [5]山东管理学院工商学院,山东济南250000

出　　处：《外国经济与管理》2022年第4期120-136,共17页Foreign Economics & Management

基　　金：国家自然科学基金青年项目(71902100)。

摘　　要：组织公正动态研究关注公正相关变量随着时间推移自身的变化、变化的触发因素,以及变化的影响。本文总结了组织公正领域在实施者视角、接受者视角以及旁观者视角的动态研究现状,得到以下结论:实施者的动态研究大多使用个体视角的理论,更多关注的是互动公正;接受者的动态研究更多关注触发因素,并且研究周期更长;旁观者视角的动态研究由于其不直接涉入具体的公正事件,因此要考虑这一特殊性等。除此之外,本文还发现个体间和个体内差异化效应尚未得到重视;现有研究大都仅使用基于间隔的数据收集方式,却忽视掉基于事件和信号的数据收集方式。基于以上发现,本文提出了发展旁观者视角及横跨多个领域和视角的研究、构建个体内和个体间差异化效应以及发展中国情境的组织公正动态研究等方面的建议和可行方向。This paper combines the three subjects(actors,receivers and observers)with the three types of dynamic changes(shift,growth&decay and ebbs&flows)proposed by McClean et al.(2019)to form a framework and systematically sort out relevant studies.Based on the field of organizational justice,this paper uses the keywords such as“justice”“fairness”“change”“dynamic”“latent growth model”and“experimental sampling method”to search related papers on the widely-recognized academic website such as“Web of Science”“EBSCO”“Proquest”and so on.After collecting and summarizing the relevant literature in Chinese and English journals,this paper forms a 3×3 table to illustrate the existing organizational justice research from the dynamic perspective and obtains the following conclusion.Firstly,the development of the dynamic research of organizational justice is unbalanced.On the one hand,compared to the dynamic research of organizational justice from the perspectives of actor and receiver,the perspective of observer has not yet started.On the other hand,there is also unbalanced research development of the three dynamic types within one certain subject perspective.The study of growth&decay mainly focuses on the overall justice,while the study of ebbs&flows focuses relatively more on the four dimensions of justice(procedure justice,distribution justice,interpersonal justice and information justice).Secondly,existing literature does not fully develop the possibility of dynamic methods in theoretical construction.At present,most dynamic researches in the field of organizational justice still regard dynamics as a tool or method to carry out studies,but fail to fully seize the opportunity of deepening its theoretical verification and construction.Thirdly,domestic organizational justice researchers have not paid full attention to dynamic research.Although both dynamic and organizational justice scholars in China have accumulated relatively rich research results,it is very regrettable that the existing resear

关 键 词：动态研究 组织公正 转换 消涨 起伏 

分 类 号：F270[经济管理—企业管理]