创造性团队中地位竞争对团队创新的作用机制--基于解决公共产品困境和团队信任视角  

Mechanism of Status Competition on Team Innovation in Creative Team:Based on the Perspective of Solving Public Goods Dilemma and Team Trust

作　　者：张少峰 陈於婷 张彪[1] 吴远鹏 Zhang Shaofeng;Chen Yuting;Zhang Biao;Wu Yuanpeng(Party School of Anhui Provincial Committee of C.P.C(Anhui Academy of Governance),Hefei 230022,China;School of Management,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei 230026,China;School of Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)

机构地区：[1]中共安徽省委党校(安徽行政学院),安徽合肥230022 [2]中国科学技术大学管理学院,安徽合肥230026 [3]南京大学管理学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《科技进步与对策》2022年第15期129-139,共11页Science & Technology Progress and Policy

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072084);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71732002);中共中央党校(国家行政学院)全国党校(行政学院)系统重点调研课题(2021DXXTZDDYKT040)。

摘　　要：当今社会发展迅速,不确定性成为环境的重要特征,创新与学习是企业获取竞争优势的关键举措。团队创新涉及冲突和利益分配的复杂过程,影响团队创新的关键问题在于识别和解决组织公共产品困境。改变供给收益的地位竞争对公共产品知识分享和风险承担的关系还不明确,且在团队信任的边界条件下对团队创新的影响也有待进一步澄清。因此,有必要在解决组织公共产品困境的视角下,探索不同类型地位竞争行为对团队创新的影响效应。通过对来自29个项目团队的233份配对样本进行实证分析发现:威望型地位竞争对团队创新有积极影响,支配型地位竞争则负向影响团队创新;知识分享和风险承担是地位竞争影响团队创新的中介机制,威望型地位竞争是解决组织公共产品困境的有效方式;团队内部信任氛围也会对团队层面的地位竞争行为产生影响,关系信任正向调节威望型地位竞争与知识分享和风险承担的关系,威胁信任负向调节威望型地位竞争与风险承担的关系,正向调节支配型地位竞争与知识分享的关系。It has become inevitable to have internal benign competition and effective cooperation of innovative enterprises for the survival and development of organizations in the society full of uncertainties and risks.Compared with individual innovation,team innovation involves a complex political process of conflicts and benefit distribution.Sociologists believe that the key factor affecting team innovation is to identify and solve the dilemma of organizational public goods.Knowledge sharing and risk taking are typical public goods in organizational learning and innovation,and they have economic externalities.In order to stimulate and improve team innovation,it is necessary to understand and solve the dilemma of public goods in team innovation.There is heat discussion on the mechanism of promoting team innovation at home and abroad,yet few scholars have conducted researches on the process of team innovation from the perspective of public goods in China,or the mechanism to solve the dilemma of team public goods.One of the solutions to the dilemma of public goods,introduced by the Social Cooperation School,is contribution revenue adjustment,that is,to provide a selective incentive or reward based on employee behaviors.Intangible benefits such as status,power and reputation are becoming the high-level pursuit of modern people.Status competition in team activities is emerging.In terms of motivation types,status competition can be divided into prestige status competition under prosocial motivation and dominant status competition under egoistic motivation.Motivation theory holds that there are significant differences in a series of organizational behaviors among employees with different motivations,so the status competition behaviors of innovators with different motivations may have a differentiated impact on the supply of team public goods and team innovation.Meanwhile,team activities are shaped by organizational context,and team trust is an important situational factor affecting employee behaviors.Team trust is a kind of ac

关 键 词：地位竞争 团队创新 公共产品困境 知识分享 风险承担 团队信任 

分 类 号：C936[经济管理—管理学]