交互主观性的3种研究范式  

Three Research Paradigms on Intersubjectivity

作　　者：杨旭 王雅琪 Yang Xu;Wang Ya-qi(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China;College of Foreign.Languages,Yuzhang Normal University,Nanchang 330103,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学文学院,武汉430072 [2]豫章师范学院外国语学院,南昌330103

出　　处：《外语学刊》2022年第4期105-111,共7页Foreign Language Research

基　　金：武汉大学自主科研项目(人文社会科学)的研究成果;“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”资助。

摘　　要：文章介绍交互主观性的研究概况,包括历史源流、代表学者、专刊介绍和热点问题等,梳理和比较了3种研究范式,包括以Traugott为代表的语义路径、以Verhagen、Nuyts为代表的认知—语用路径和以Du Bois为代表的互动路径,发现其区别在于:语义路径关注已被编码或由显性语言标记表示的交互主观性;认知—语用路径把交互主观性视为认知现象,关注语言使用中意义的修辞表征;互动路径把交互主观性理解为一种有序社会互动的结果,把它置于社会实践而非人类大脑之中。当然这些路径也存在共同点,即都认同语言的交互主观性基于规约性。文章最后述评国内相关研究,指出存在的问题和改进方向。The paper presents an overview of intersubjectivity research, including its historical origins, representative scholars, monographs and hot issues. Then three paradigms are discussed and compared, including the semantic approach represented by Traugott, the cognitive-pragmatic approach represented by Verhagen and Nuyts, and the interactive approach represented by Du Bois. The semantic approach focuses on intersubjectivity encoded or represented by explicit linguistic expressions;the cognitive-pragmatic approach takes intersubjectivity as a cognitive phenomenon and concerns the rhetorical representation of meaning in language use;the interactional approach understands intersubjectivity as an achievement of organized social interaction, therefore focusing on intersubjectivity situated in the social world rather than the human mind. Nonetheless, they all agree that intersubjecti-vity is based on normativity of language. The paper finally introduces and comments on the domestic research on intersubjectivity.

关 键 词：交互主观性 交互主观化 主观性 Traugott Verhagen Du Bois 

分 类 号：B089[哲学宗教—哲学理论]