检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭宗峰[1] Peng Zongfeng(Institute of Philosophy,Shandong Academy of Social Sciences,Jiinan Shandong 250002)
机构地区:[1]山东社会科学院哲学研究所,山东济南250002
出 处:《宁夏社会科学》2022年第4期136-146,共11页NingXia Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“社区赋权的合作机制建构研究”(项目编号:18CSH038)。
摘 要:内卷概念被用于理解当下中国社会的知识合法性何在,是一个需要深入省思的问题。从一种知识框架及其合法性反思角度看,当下国内网络流行话语中内卷概念知识框架的非均衡性与概念尚未塑造完成、学术理论话语中内卷概念知识框架的形式化以及内卷概念本土应用中存在的三种轻视,共同消解了内卷概念被用于理解当下中国社会的知识合法性。在一种概念的社会—历史反思意义上,内卷概念的深层知识框架其实是在一种立体的反思结构中追问符合实际的真正创新何以可能的社会融合转化过程。在此意义上,网络流行话语中的内卷概念被用于理解当下中国社会的知识合法性,在于通过三重反思来追问符合实际的真正创新何以可能,以解答自主现代化过程中的阶段性转换问题,并赢得下一个决定性创新红利。What is the knowledge legitimacy of“involution”which is used to understand the contemporary Chinese society,is a question that needs to be profound reflection.From a reflective perspective of the knowledge framework and its legitimacy,the knowledge legitimacy of“involution”is jointly dissolved by following factors,such as the disequilibrium and under-construction of the involution concept in the domestic network popular discourse,the formalization of the involution concept in the academic discourse and the three kinds of contempt of the local application of the involution concept.In the sense of social-historical reflection of the concept,the deep knowledge framework of“involution”is a social fusion and transformation process based on a ask of possibility of realistic and truly innovation in a stereo reflection structure.In this sense,the knowledge legitimacy of“involution”in the domestic network popular discourse,can be understood as through a three reflections ask of possibility of realistic and truly innovation to answer the phase transformation issues in the independent process of modernization and gain the dividends of the next decisive innovation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.106.206