基于书面纠正性反馈的言说活动对学习者写作修改的影响  

The Effect of WCF-based Languaging on Learners’ Writing Revision

作　　者：秦丽莉[1] 牛宝贵 QIN Lili;NIU Baogui

机构地区：[1]大连外国语大学公共外语教研部,大连116044 [2]大连外国语大学,大连116044

出　　处：《当代外语研究》2022年第3期92-101,共10页Contemporary Foreign Language Studies

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅重点攻关项目“‘社会文化理论’指导的外语学习者在大规模线上学习情境中的能动性研究”(编号2020JYT02)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：本研究对比调研了基于直接/间接书面纠正性反馈所进行的书面言说活动对学习者写作修改的影响。研究将12名学生按照语言水平测试成绩分为无显著性差异的两组(6人/组),并按照“撰写作文初稿→接受直接/间接书面纠正性反馈→书面言说活动→修改作文”的顺序完成任务。随后,研究人员对作文初稿和修改稿以及言说活动的文本进行标注分析。研究结果表明,两组学习者的初稿和修改稿的错误数均具有组内显著性差异,即修改稿的错误数显著少于初稿中的错误数量;两组学习者的组间错误修改成功率均不具有显著性差异,但基于间接书面纠正性反馈进行书面言说对作文质量提升的效果较好。The study compared the effects of written languaging(WL) on learners’ writing revision based on direct/indirect written corrective feedback(WCF). 12 participants were divided into two groups with insignificant difference according to their language proficiency test scores(6 participants/group). All participants completed the following tasks in sequence: writing the draft, receiving direct/indirect WCF, taking part in WL, and revising the draft. The researchers then analyzed the drafts, the revised drafts and the text of WL. It was found that, in both groups, the number of errors in the original and the revised drafts was significantly different. That is, the latter was significantly lower than the former. In addition, no significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of error correction rate. However, indirect WCF-based WL was more effective in improving the quality of writing.

关 键 词：书面言说 书面纠正性反馈 作文修改 

分 类 号：C42[社会学]