检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王建 凌丽 WANG Jian;LING Li(School of Humanities,Geely University of China,Chengdu 641423,China;Department of Foreign Languages,Southwest Jiaotong University Hope College,Chengdu 610400,China)
机构地区:[1]吉利学院,四川省成都市641423 [2]西南交通大学希望学院外语系,四川省成都市610400
出 处:《外文研究》2022年第2期6-15,105,共11页Foreign Studies
摘 要:本研究采用2×3的实验设计,考察了不同类型的词汇注释对英语词汇附带学习的协同效应。结果发现词汇注释与任务投入量对词汇附带学习存在主效应和交互效应,提出的4个假设也得到了验证:1)任务投入量同等的条件下,3种词汇注释的词汇附带学习效果存在差异,其中“英文释义+例句”的促学效果最优,“中文释义”最差;2)词汇注释相同的情况下,投入量大的任务比投入量小的任务更有利于词汇附带学习;3)词汇注释及任务投入量两个变量对词汇附带学习存在协同效应;4)词汇附带学习效果随着时间的推移而减弱,具体表现为受试即时词汇后测成绩均优于延时词汇后测成绩。By adopting a 2×3 experimental design, this study examines the synergistic effect of glosses and reading tasks involving different amounts of task-induced investment(abrieviated as TII) on incidental learning of English vocabulary. The research results reveal the main effects and interaction effect of lexical glosses and load on vocabulary acquisition, and confirm the four hypotheses: 1) The TII load being equal, the three lexical glosses generate different effects on incidental vocabulary learning, with “English explanation + one example sentence” being the best and“Chinese translation only” the worst;2) Lexical glosses remaining the same, tasks involving larger amounts of investment are more conducive to incidental vocabulary learning than those with smaller amounts of investment;3) Both variables, i.e. lexical glosses and TII load produce a synergistic effect on incidental vocabulary learning;4) With the passage of time, the effect of incidental vocabulary learning weakens, which is specifically evidenced by the fact that results of the immediate lexical post-test are better than those of the delayed lexical post-test.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.207.109