历史描述、文学本位与符号学方法——评《中国文学图像关系史》  

Historical Description,Literary Standard and Semiotic Method:A Review of The History of the Relationship between Chinese Literature and Images

作　　者：赵敬鹏 Zhao Jingpeng

机构地区：[1]东南大学艺术学院 [2]江苏第二师范学院文学院

出　　处：《艺术设计研究》2022年第4期117-121,共5页Art & Design Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“明清小说戏曲图像学研究”(项目编号:19ZDA256)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《中国文学图像关系史》是“文学与图像关系”问题域的首部史论著作。它站在“文学本位”的学术立场,重点爬梳中国古代文学图像的历史脉络与形态演进,为学界研究此类选题,拟或编撰相关丛书等,积累了先行经验。全书直面“图像时代”的文学现实,试图通过历史研究回应文学危机及其背后的符号危机,由此凝练出“语-图”比较符号学方法,可谓西方图像学的中国化。然而,丛书也留下一些遗憾,特别是“古代”与“现代”、“描述”与“概括”、“历史”与“理论”的三重脱节,导致未能完整呈现中国文学与图像关系的古今之变,“语-图”关系的反思性概括与原创性理论亦较为薄弱。这给学界从事后续研究提供了延展的空间。The History of the Relationship between Chinese Literature and Images is the first historical work in the problem area of"The Relationship between Literature and Images".It stands on the academic stand of"literature-based",focuses on combing the historical context and morphological evolution of ancient Chinese literary images,and accumulates pioneering experience for the academic community to study such selected topics and prepare or compile relevant series of books.The book directly faces the literary reality of the"image era"and tries to respond to the literary crisis and the symbolic crisis behind it through historical research,thus condensing the"language-image"comparative semiotics method,which can be described as the sinicization of Western iconography.However,the series of books also left some regrets,especially the triple disconnect between"ancient"and"modern","description"and"generalization","history"and"theory",resulting in the failure to fully present the ancient and modern changes in the relationship between Chinese literature and images,and the reflective generalization and original theory of the"language-image"relationship are also relatively weak.This provides an extended space for scholars.

关 键 词：《中国文学图像关系史》 史论 文学本位 比较符号学 

分 类 号：J05[艺术—艺术理论]