检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马跃[1] 冯连勇[1] MA Yue;FENG Lian-yong(School of Economics and Management,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China)
机构地区:[1]中国石油大学(北京)经济管理学院,北京102249
出 处:《运筹与管理》2022年第8期195-202,共8页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71874202)。
摘 要:为应对气候变化问题,《京都议定书》等文件催生了以CO_(2)排放权作为商品的碳交易市场的建立。研究中国试点碳排放权交易市场的有效性对我国统一碳市场的建设以及碳中和目标的实现具有重要的指导意义。本文选取有效交易日数据,对中国试点碳市场的有效性进行探索性研究,结合有效市场假说理论与分形市场假说理论,分别采用游程检验法、方差比检验法以及重标极差分析法对中国碳市场有效性进行综合分析,同时探讨各方法导致计算结果不一致的原因,并利用GARCH模型进行检验。研究表明:中国试点碳市场未能达到弱式有效水平。同时,根据中国目前碳市场运行现状给出一定的建议。In order to deal with climate change,the Kyoto Protocol and other documents gives birth to the establishment of carbon trading market with CO_(2) emission rights as a commodity.It is of great significance to study the effectiveness of China’s pilot carbon emission trading market for the construction of China’s unified carbon market and the realization of carbon neutral target.This paper selects daily effective trading data to conduct an exploratory study on the effectiveness of China’s pilot carbon market,combined with the effective market hypothesis theory and the fractal market hypothesis,and uses the run test method,the variance ratio test method,and the rescaled range analysis method respectively to analyse the effectiveness of China’s carbon market.In addition,this study analyzes the reasons for the inconsistency of the calculation results caused by each method,and uses the GARCH model to test.The results show that China’s pilot carbon markets fail to reach the level of weak-form efficiency.At the same time,some suggestions are given according to the current situation of China’s carbon market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91