检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵亚如 李朝乾 陈云红 李书明 Zhao Yaru;Li Chaoqian;Zheng Xuewei;Chen Yunhong(College of Computer and Information Engineering,Hubei Normal University,Huangshi,Hubei,435002)
机构地区:[1]湖北师范大学计算机与信息工程学院,湖北黄石435002
出 处:《考试研究》2022年第5期78-88,共11页Examinations Research
基 金:湖北省高等学校教学改革研究项目《专业认证下师范类课程目标达成度及影响因素研究--以“现代教育技术”课程为例》(2021358),湖北师范大学研究生创新科研项目《虚拟现实环境下学习效果的影响机制与提升路径》(20220504)。
摘 要:引入国外成熟的灵活思维量表(FTL),根据Brislin经典翻译模型实现量表的本土化,形成FTL量表中文版。应用多元概化理论与经典测量理论检验量表的信效度,抽取473名本科生对量表进行实践应用分析。结果表明,FTL量表中文版的效度良好,概化系数为0.933,整体信度较高,增加开放思维维度的项目数量能够实现量表的进一步优化。开放思维的培养对学生的灵活思维具有直接促进作用,学生的FTL水平在年级上差异极其显著,并呈现出随年级阶梯递进的关系。FTL量表中文版具有良好的本土契合性,能够用于大学生灵活思维能力及倾向的评价。This study introduced the foreign mature Flexible Thinking in Learning Scale(FTL),realized the localization of the scale according to the Brislin classic translation model,and finally formed the Chinese version of the FTL scale.Multivariate generalization theory and classical measurement theory were used to test the reliability and validity of the scale,and 473 undergraduates were selected for practical application analysis of the localized FTL scale.The results showed that the FTL scale had good validity.The generalization coefficient was 0.933,and the overall reliability was high.Increasing the number of items in the dimension of open thinking could further optimize the scale.The cultivation of open thinking had a direct role in promoting students’flexible thinking.Students’FTL levels varied widely by grade and presented a progressive relationship with grade.The Chinese version of the FTL scale had a good local fit and could be used to evaluate college students’flexible thinking ability and tendency.
分 类 号:G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7