执行异议制度的异化与回归  

Alienation and Return of Enforcement Objection System

作　　者：郭小冬 GUO Xiaodong

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院

出　　处：《法治研究》2022年第4期62-70,共9页Research on Rule of Law

基　　金：国家社科重大基金项目“民事诉讼智能化的基本理论”(项目编号:18ZDA142)之子课题“民事执行程序的智能化设计的理论方案研究”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：由于立法没有明确界定执行异议的标的及理由,也未设置恶意异议的法律后果,导致司法实践中的执行异议不仅被扩大化适用,也存在被随意启动的现象。这不仅造成个案的执行会被多次中断与拖延,严重侵害债权人的合法权益,也有损执行机关的权威。立法应该对此种现象进行规制,执行人员也应当明确执行程序不同于审判程序,应以实现债权为根本的目的。Because there is not clearly definition of the object and reason of the enforcement objection in law, the enforcement objection has been proposed arbitrarily in fact. This not only causes the process to be interrupted for many times and delayed, but also infringes on the interests of creditors and deviates from the purpose of law. We should reform the rules and the judge should know that the enforcement is not the same as the trial. To protect the interests of creditors is the purpose of the enforcement.

关 键 词：执行异议 执行行为 程序性救济 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]