检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Heekyoung Song Jung Hwan Ahn Yuyeon Jung Jae Yeon Woo Jimin Cha Yang-Guk Chung Keun Ho Lee
机构地区:[1]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Incheon St.Mary’s Hospital,College of Medicine,The Catholic University of Korea,Seoul 06591,South Korea [2]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Seoul St.Mary’s Hospital,College of Medicine,The Catholic University of Korea,Seoul 06591,South Korea [3]Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,Seoul St.Mary’s Hospital,College of Medicine,The Catholic University of Korea,Seoul 06591,South Korea
出 处:《World Journal of Clinical Cases》2022年第27期9693-9702,共10页世界临床病例杂志
摘 要:BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal sarcoma(RPS) is a rare malignancy arising from mesenchymal cells that most commonly presents as an abdominal mass and is associated with poor prognosis.Although several studies have assessed the survival benefits of wide excision,few have reported detailed methods for achieving wide excision in patients with RPS.AIM To describe our experience with multidisciplinary surgical resection of RPS using intra-and extra-pelvic approaches.METHODS Multidisciplinary surgery is an anatomical approach that combines intra-and extra-peritoneal access within the same surgery to achieve complete RPS removal.This retrospective review of the records of patients who underwent multidisciplinary surgery for RPS analyzed surgical and survival outcomes.RESULTS Eight patients underwent 10 intra-and extra-pelvic surgical resections,and their median mass size was 12.75 cm(range,6-45.5 cm).Using an intrapelvic approach,laparoscopy-assisted surgery was performed in four cases and laparotomy surgery in six.Using an extrapelvic approach,ilioinguinal and posterior approaches were used in four cases each,and the prone position and midline skin incision were shared in one.All patients’ RPS masses were removed completely,and four achieved R0 resection through intra-and extra-pelvic surgery.The median estimated blood loss was 2000 m L(range,300-20000 m L) and the median hospitalization was 12.6 d(range,9-69 d).Reoperation was needed in two patients(one for wound necrosis and the other for bowel perforation and wound necrosis).The median overall survival rate and median progression-free survival were 64.6 and 13.7 mo,respectively.CONCLUSION RPS is therapeutically challenging because of its location and high risk of recurrence.Therefore,intra-and extra-pelvic surgical approaches can improve the macroscopic security of the surgical margin.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7