悲剧审美与生命意义的诠释——以尹雪艳和筱燕秋人物形象为例  

The Interpretation of Tragic Aesthetics and Life Meaning——Taking Yin Xueyan and Xiao Yanqiu as Examples

作　　者：程筱晏 CHENG Xiaoyan(College of Humanities Jiangnan University Wuxi Jiangsu,214122,China)

机构地区：[1]江南大学人文学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《文化创新比较研究》2022年第27期10-13,共4页Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

摘　　要：在撕裂和破碎的悲剧化书写中,白先勇和毕飞宇创作了许多丰富生动的人物形象,代表性的人物分别有尹雪艳和筱燕秋。表面上看二者差异很大,但在某种程度上都体现了悲剧故事情境下关于人生命运、关于生存状态的思考。欧阳子对白先勇《台北人》主题的命意评析有“今非昔比”“灵肉之争”与“生死之谜”,此3点在尹雪艳和筱燕秋身上都有深刻的体现。该文以两个人物形象为载体,试分析白先勇和毕飞宇在以上3个方面的悲剧性内容书写,同时感受其呈现的审美意蕴,体味对生命意义与生存价值的思考。In the tragic writing of tearing and breaking,Bai Xianyong and Bi Feiyu created many vivid characters,and the representative figures were Yin Xueyan and Xiao Yanqiu.On the surface,they are quite different,but to some extent,they both reflect the thinking about the fate of life and the state of existence in the context of tragic stories.Ouyang Zi’s comments on the theme of Bai Xianyong’s Taipei pople include "the present is not the same as before" "the dispute between soul and flesh" and "the mystery of life and death",which are deeply reflected in Yin Xueyan and Xiao Yanqiu.Taking two characters as the carrier,this paper tries to analyze the tragic content writing of Bai Xianyong and Bi Feiyu in the above three aspects,and at the same time feel the aesthetic implication presented by them,and appreciate the thinking on the meaning of life and the value of existence.

关 键 词：尹雪艳 筱燕秋 悲剧审美 生命意义 

分 类 号：I0-02[文学—文学理论]