送达制度的结构性转向 从“结果型”走向“过程型”  

The Structural Shift of Service System From Result-oriented Model to Process-oriented Model

作　　者：张兴美[1] Zhang Xingmei

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院

出　　处：《中外法学》2022年第5期1260-1277,共18页Peking University Law Journal

基　　金：2020年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“电子诉讼趋势下电子化证据适用问题研究”(项目编号:20SFB3014)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：我国的送达制度是按照结果导向型思维打造的“结果型”送达。“结果型”送达是以受送达人为主体偏向、以实质性送达效果为制度目标和法院全责型的送达结构,这种结构为送达不能、送而不达等送达难现象提供了制度环境。规范的送达制度应当是按照过程导向型思维打造的“过程型”送达。“过程型”送达是以受送达人程序利益为保护对象、以过程理性为制度核心、可实现程序自治的送达结构。由“结果型”送达向“过程型”送达转向是解决我国送达制度困境、重构我国送达制度的具体路径。该路径的实现以强化送达过程的理性建设为重点,信息化手段、社会化方法、交互性机制和推定规则可以为我国送达制度结构性转向提供技术保障。China’s service system is based on result-oriented thinking, which focuses on subjective state of the party to be serviced, and takes the substantive service result as the objective. In addition, the court is almost fully responsible for the legality of service. This model provides an institutional environment for difficulties in service such as non-service and unsuccessful service. The more desirable service system should be built based on the process-oriented thinking. The process-oriented model takes procedural interests of the party to be serviced as the protection object and process rationality as the core of the system, which could realize the procedural autonomy. The shift from result-oriented service to process-oriented service is a specific path to solve the dilemma of service system and reconstruct the system. Strengthening the rational construction of service process is critical for realizing such a goal. Moreover, such means as information technology, socialization methods, interactive mechanisms and presumption rules can provide guarantees for the structural shift of service system in China.

关 键 词：送达 送达难 电子送达 过程导向 结果导向 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]