检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗旭[1] 刘广富[1] Luo Xu;Liu Guangfu(Hunan Judicial Police Vocational College,Changsha Hunan 410131,China)
出 处:《衡阳师范学院学报》2022年第5期129-137,共9页Journal of Hengyang Normal University
基 金:湖南省职教高地建设理论与实践研究课题“高职院校教师能力标准和评价体系建设研究”(ZJGD2021064)。
摘 要:推进高职院校教师能力评价改革,既是职业教育改革的题中之义,也是高职院校建设高素质、专业化、创新型教师队伍的现实之需。在梳理高职院校教师评价相关政策文本和研究文献的基础上,运用层次分析法,构建了教学型、教学科研型、双师双能型等三类高职院校教师的能力评价指标体系。这三类体系在评价指标上是一致的,但在指标的具体权重上各有侧重,既体现了高职教师职业素养的全面性,也兼顾了不同类型教师的特殊性。研究表明,自律能力是高职院校教师的重要能力,教学能力、科研能力、服务能力于三类教师而言各有侧重,而扎实的业务能力和卓著的工作实绩都是高职院校教师取得良好评价结果的关键。Promoting the reform of teachers'ability evaluation in higher vocational colleges is not only the meaning of vocational education reform,but also the realistic need to build a high-quality,professional and innovative teacher team.On the basis of sorting out the relevant policies and literature on the evaluation of teachers in higher vocational colleges,this paper uses the analytic hierarchy process to build the ability evaluation index systems of teaching type teachers,teaching and research type teachers and double-qualified teachers in higher vocational colleges respectively.These systems are consistent in evaluation indicators and different in the weight of indicators,which not only reflects the comprehensiveness of vocational teachers'professional quality,but also reflects the particularity of different types of teachers.The index systems show that self-discipline ability is an important ability of teachers in higher vocational colleges,while the importance of teaching ability,research ability and service ability vary in different types.However,solid professional ability and outstanding work performance are the key to obtain good evaluation results for teachers in higher vocational colleges.
分 类 号:G715[文化科学—职业技术教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30