盗掘古墓葬罪既遂未遂问题论析  

An Analysis of Accomplished and Attempted Offense of Excavating Ancient Tombs

作　　者：靳平川 JIN Pingchuan(Shanxi Police College,Taiyuan Shanxi 030401,China)

机构地区：[1]山西警察学院,山西太原030401

出　　处：《山西警察学院学报》2022年第4期20-25,共6页Journal of Shanxi Police College

基　　金：2020至2021年度山西省社科联重点课题“山西文物扫黑战役行动研究”(SSKLZDKT2020139)。

摘　　要：2015年12月“两高”作出文物犯罪的新司法解释,在盗掘行为之外,增加“损害价值”作为盗掘古墓葬罪构成既遂的另一必要条件,一线办案人员对此有疑惑。结合发案形势和理论分析,建议立法上可以考虑适时删改2015年相关司法解释第8条第2款,适法环节在不突破现有法律框架条件下,应视盗掘行为达及古墓葬的地上封土、地下墓道墓坑填土或墓室,以爆破形式或机械设备在古墓葬紧外缘挖掘,或者以古墓葬为目标采取平洞、竖平混合洞挖掘等不同情形,分别做出既遂、未遂但不从轻、减轻的处罚。In December 2015,the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate made a new judicial interpretation,adding “value damage” as another prerequisite for accomplished offense of excavating ancient tombs,which made front-line case-handling personnel confused.Combined with the situation and theoretical analysis,it is suggested that in Item 2,Article 8 of relevant judicial interpretation made in 2015 could be deleted and modified timely.Based on legal adaption links without breaking the existing legal framework,theft acts,involving ground sealing soil of ancient tombs,soil filled in underground,burial chambers,excavating areas just next to the ancient tombs in the form of blasting or mechanical equipment,punching holes horizontally or horizontally and vertically together in parallel area of ancient tombs,should be punished as accomplished offense,attempted offense but without lenient penalties and attempted offense with lenient penalties respectively depending on the different situations.

关 键 词：盗掘 古墓葬 既遂 未遂 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]