比较文化阐释学方法论  

Comparative Cultural Hermeneutics as Method

作　　者：安乐哲[1] 赵延风(译) 温海明(译审)[3] Roger T.Ames(Department of Philosophy at Peking University)

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100091 [2]北京大学对外汉语教育学院,北京100091 [3]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《孔学堂》2022年第3期4-13,I0004-I0014,共21页Confucian Academy

摘　　要：本文从杜威关于直接经验的预设出发,阐述我的比较文化阐释学方法论。在比较文化阐释学领域,随着对一个尚未理解的传统中所包含的不同寻常的文化预设探究的深入,我们对自身哲学预设理解的自觉性也日益增强。这种通过其自身术语来理解某一传统之类比的方法,要求我们对于客观性必须抛弃自己所熟悉的实有论之理解,而以一种共同的阐释性目标代之。为了这个我们可以信任的共同目标,我们放弃了存在绝对真理的客观性预设。In this essay,the author begins from John Dewey’s postulate of immediate experience in formulating his method of comparative cultural hermeneutics.In comparative cultural hermeneutics,understanding emerges within the hermeneutical circle by becoming increasingly self-conscious about our own philosophical assumptions as we attempt to fathom the uncommon assumptions of a tradition we do not yet understand.Given this analogical method,taking the other tradition on its own terms requires that we abandon the familiar realist understanding of objectivity and replace it with the notion of a shared interpretive objective.We surrender the objectivity that promises truth for a shared objective we can trust.

关 键 词：阐释学 伽达默尔式“成见” 客观性 直接经验主义 过程宇宙论 

分 类 号：G04[文化科学] B089.2[哲学宗教—哲学理论]