共同犯罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度的风险与规制--基于分案审理的研究  

The risk and regulation of the leniency system of guilty plea in joint crime cases--Research based on case division of proceedings

作　　者：杨杰辉[1] Yang Jiehui(School of Law,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江工业大学法学院,浙江杭州310023

出　　处：《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第6期42-49,共8页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“刑事一体化视域下一事不再理的效力范围研究”(20BFX092)。

摘　　要：允许将共同犯罪案件中认罪被告人与不认罪被告人分案审理,可能会产生侵害不认罪被告人的诉讼权利、损害定罪量刑的准确性以及被检察院用于实现不当目的等风险。造成这些风险的主要原因包括:未确立被告人完整的对质询问权,未明确前案裁判与后案裁判的关系,检察院在起诉方式与认罪认罚从宽制度的适用上居于主导地位等。为规避共同犯罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度的风险,应采取赋予被告人完整的对质询问权、明确前案裁判与后案裁判的关系、强化法院对审理方式的实质决定权,以及对认罪案件与不认罪案件的实质性审判等对策。Allowing the defendant who pleads guilty and the defendant who does not plead guilty in a joint crime case to be tried separately may lead to the risk of infringing upon the litigation rights of the defendant who does not plead guilty,damaging the accuracy of conviction and sentencing,and being used by the procuratorate for improper purposes.The main reasons for these risks include:the defendant’s complete right to question has not been established;the relationship between the former case’s judgment and the latter case’s judgment has not been clarified and the procuratorate is in the leading position in the prosecution mode and the leniency of confession and punishment.In order to avoid the risk of applying the leniency system of guilty plea and punishment in joint crime cases,countermeasures should be taken,such as giving the defendant a complete right to question,clarifying the relationship between the previous case judgment and the subsequent case judgment,strengthening the court’s substantive decision-making power on the trial mode,and conducting substantive trials of guilty plea cases and non guilty plea cases.

关 键 词：共同犯罪案件 认罪认罚从宽制度 分案审理 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]