检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗志田[1,2] Luo Zhitian
机构地区:[1]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610065 [2]北京大学历史系,北京100871
出 处:《文史哲》2022年第6期25-37,162,共14页Literature,History,and Philosophy
摘 要:在20世纪20年代初,梁启超、胡适、吴宓等文化立场不同的趋新学人,不约而同地“发现”了过去书院制的优点——自由讲学。他们都看到废科举以后的新教育出现了根本性问题,而书院这一“传统”体制中,却蕴含着走向现代的可能性。清季废书院的同时也剥蚀了民间固有的办学资源,使后来想要通过自下而上的方式修改中国教育体制成为极其困难的事。然吸收“书院精神”的做法,当时已有所尝试,后来也在延续。在那个年代,他们已注意到人的物化问题,提出了从“物的教育”回归“人的教育”这样跨时代的根本主张。In the early 1920s, the new style scholars holding various cultural positions such as Liang Qichao, Hu Shi, and Wu Mi coincidentally “discovered” the merits of traditional academy, that is free lecture. They all saw the fundamental problem lied in the education system after the abolition of imperial examination, yet there contained the possibility toward modernization in the “traditional” system of academy. While the academy system was abolished in the Qing dynasty, the original resources of school in civil society were also corroded, thus it became extremely difficult to change China’s education system from below. The attempts of absorbing the “spirited of academy” had emerged and continued afterwards. At that time, they had noticed the problem of materialization of man, and then raised the intergenerational proposition of returning “education about things” to “education of human being”.
关 键 词:书院制 学校制 道尔顿制 自由讲学 人的教育 物的教育
分 类 号:G649.299[文化科学—高等教育学] K261[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33