检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任令涛 Ren Lingtao
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学教育科学研究院 [2]教育部长江经济带地区新工科教育研究基地
出 处:《高等工程教育研究》2022年第6期193-199,共7页Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基 金:全国教育科学“十四五”规划2021年度教育部青年课题“实践哲学视域下工程教育中理论与实践关系研究”(EIA210432)。
摘 要:鉴于对理论或实践的侧重,考察美国工程教育发展历程,可以将其分为三个历史阶段:基于实践的工程教育模式、基于科学理论的工程教育模式、平衡实践与科学理论的工程教育模式。对美国工程教育发展历程探析发现,工程教育中的理论与实践如同天平的两端,天平失衡的根源来自于工程教育二元分裂性,即工程教育建立在理论和实践这一二元分裂的基石上。基于此,分析工程教育二元分裂性的内涵、表征,并提出破解工程教育二元分裂性困境的路径,为我国工程教育改革提供相关借鉴。In view of the emphasis on theory or practice, the development of engineering education in the United States can be divided into three historical stages: the engineering education mode based on practice, the engineering education mode based on scientific theory, and the engineering education mode that balances practice and scientific theory. Through the analysis of the development process of engineering education in the United States, it is found that theory and practice in engineering education are like the two ends of the balance. The source of the imbalance of the balance comes from the dualistic split of engineering education, that is, engineering education is built on the basis of the dualistic split of theory and practice. Based on this, this paper analyzes the connotation and characterization of the dualistic split of engineering education, and proposes a path to solve the dilemma of the dualistic split of engineering education, so as to provide relevant references for the reform of engineering education in China.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] TB-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49