检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尚丽丽[1] Shang Lili
机构地区:[1]南京中医药大学“双一流”建设处,南京210023
出 处:《江苏高教》2022年第12期54-58,共5页Jiangsu Higher Education
基 金:2022年校本科教学教改研究课题重大项目“中药学卓越人才培养模式创新研究”(NZYJG2022002)。
摘 要:大学评价与大学发展相伴而生。随着“双一流”建设迈向新的阶段,社会各界对大学评价的关注和期待更加热切。知识生产方式的悄然变革对大学评价产生了新的影响:评价主体的单一性与多元知识生产主体间的冲突、评估标准的统一性与学科发展特色间的冲突、一级学科评估与知识生产跨学科间的冲突。为此,呼应“双一流”建设诉求创新大学评价理念和机制、以立德树人为核心构建多元融合的评价体系、以内涵发展为目标探索回归知识生产本源的评价方法就显得尤为迫切。University evaluation evolves with university development.With the construction of"double first-class"marching toward a new stage,the society from all walks of life attach more attention and expectation to university evaluation.The knowledge production mode transformation,meanwhile,has quietly brought new influence on university evaluation,such as the conflicts between the single evaluation subject and the multi knowledge producers,the uniformity of evaluation standards and the characteristics of discipline development,the first-level discipline ranking evaluation and the practice of interdisciplinary knowledge production.Therefore,in response to the demands of"double first-class"construction,it is particularly urgent to innovate the university evaluation concept and mechanism,to build a diversified and integrated evaluation system with moral education as the core,and to reform evaluation methods by returning to the origin of knowledge production.Only in this way can first-class universities in China promote and achieve the characteristic construction,high-quality construction and sustainable construction.Finally,the overall level and international competitiveness of high education in China will be elevated.
关 键 词:“双一流”建设 大学评价 学科建设 知识生产方式
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28