我国民事诉讼个案举证释明问题探析  

Exploring the Issue of Judge's Instruction to Litigant's Proof in Specific Cases in Civil Procedure in China

作　　者：奇昕侠 QI Xinxia(School of Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200050

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2022年第12期46-53,88,共9页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

摘　　要：现代民事证据制度对法院释明的要求越来越具有针对性和具体性,近年来我国立法和司法也在不断完善,立法上进一步完善举证规则,司法上则表现为举证释明的加大适用。为了充分发挥举证释明在我国司法实践尤其是个案中的重要作用,需要通过立法加强个案举证释明的规制,法官正确区分主客观证明责任以正确分配举证责任从而形成主体保障,辅之以适度的心证公开与集中审理原则,建立并完善相应的约束与救济机制,让当事人基于对法官心证的了解及时进行资料和陈述意见的补充,使其积极参与事实认定的过程,从而避免裁判突袭,有效保护当事人实体及程序上之权益。The modern civil evidence system has become more and more relevant and specific to the requirements of court interpretation,and in recent years China's legislation and judiciary have also been improving,legislatively to further improve the rules of proof,and judicially to show the increased application of the interpretation of proof.In order to give full play to the important role of explanation of proof in China's judicial practice,especially in individual cases,it is necessary to strengthen the regulation of explanation of proof through legislation,judges correctly distinguish the subjective and objective burden of proof in order to correctly allocate the burden of proof so as to form the main body of protection,supplemented by the principle of moderate public and centralized hearing of evidence,the establishment and improvement of the corresponding restraint and relief mechanism,so that the parties based on the judge's understanding of the evidence in a timely manner This will enable the parties to participate actively in the process of determining the facts,thus avoiding surprise decisions and effectively protecting the substantive and procedural rights of the parties.

关 键 词：举证释明 个案 心证公开 裁判突袭 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]