论学术自治框架下学位评价的组织法原理  

A Study on the Principles of the Organization on Degree Evaluation within the Framework of Academic Autonomy

作　　者：戴国立[1] Dai Guoli

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学教育法治研究中心

出　　处：《东方法学》2022年第6期162-172,共11页Oriental Law

基　　金：上海市教育委员会“上海市教育法学人才培养计划--高校学位评定委员会权力运行的程序规制”(项目批准号:2020JYFXR047)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：高校法人化是落实学术自治的重要组织路径,是学术研究自由和受教育权合并实现的组织机制。从组织定位角度看,学生、导师、院系、学术委员会、学位评定委员会等都是参与学位评价的主体。从学位评价的规范和标准方面看,学术委员会是规范和标准的制定机构,学位评定委员会是规范和标准的执行机构。学位评定过程中涉及学术不端调查的,学术委员会是学位评定委员会的协助机构。为实现和落实学术自治,高校学位评价组织关系应当坚持学术评价,排斥行政评价,同时还应当受到同行评议原则的约束。The incorporation of colleges and universities is an important organizational path for implementing academic autonomy and the mechanism for ensuring academic research freedom and the right to education. From the organizational perspective, students, supervisors, schools, academic committees and degree evaluation committees are the bodies engaged in degree evaluation. From the perspective of degree evaluation norms and standards, the academic committee is the body that formulates the norms and standards, and the degree evaluation committee is the body that implements them. The academic committee is the body that assists the degree evaluation committee to carry out the academic misconduct investigation. To put academic autonomy into practice, the organizational relationship in terms of degree evaluation should uphold academic evaluation, exclude administrative evaluation and be bound by principle of the peer review.

关 键 词：高校法人化 学术自治 学位评价 组织法 学术委员会 同行评议 

分 类 号：DF36[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]