从“何以可能”到“如何实现”--论牟宗三道德形上学的黑格尔辩证法原型  

From“How Moral Can Be Possible”to“How to Make Moral Reality”:On the Hegel’s Prototype of Mou Tsung-san’s Moral Metaphysics

作　　者：王时中[1] WANG Shizhong

机构地区：[1]南开大学哲学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2022年第11期36-44,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“五四以来科学观的变迁与马克思主义的深度中国化研究”(项目编号:19BZX019)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：牟宗三以康德哲学作为中西哲学汇通的桥梁,将康德“道德何以可能”的追问转化为“道德如何实现”的论证,展现了儒家道德理想作为“生命的学问”的独特价值。但从康德的“有限理性存在者”的视角看,牟宗三的道德形上学是以黑格尔辩证法为原型的“道德理性”版本,他所区分的“道德理性三义”,实质上是以黑格尔辩证法改造康德道德形而上学的“肯定”“否定”与“否定之否定”的三种形态。如何批判性地清理牟宗三道德形上学的“康德哲学桥梁”与“黑格尔辩证法原型”,以构造一种表征中国传统哲学的科学形式,至今依然是中国思想界亟待突破的难局。Mou Tsung-san changed the topic of Moral Metaphysics from“How Moral can be Possible”to“How to Make Moral Reality”to communicate Chinese and Western Philosophy with the bridge of Kant philosophy and illuminate the Characteristics of the Confucianism as the wisdom of life.However,from Kant’s view of human being as the bounded rationality,From Kant’s view of human being as the bounded rationality,Mou Tsung-san’s Moral Metaphysics was Hegel’s moral edition based on his dialectics,and his three levels of Moral Reason were a different form of Hegel’s Dialectics.There is a long way to go if we continue to tell the difference between the bridge of Kant’s Moral Metaphysics and the Prototype of Hegel’s Dialectics critically before constructing the scientific form of traditional Chinese Philosophy.

关 键 词：牟宗三 道德形上学 康德 黑格尔 道德理性三义 科玄论战 

分 类 号：B261[哲学宗教—中国哲学]