证据法学是法学吗--证据法学界限的教义学分析  

Does Evidence Law Belong to Law Science:Doctrinal Analysis of the Boundary of Evidence Law

作　　者：阮堂辉[1] RUAN Tang-hui

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学法学院,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《中南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2022年第12期115-122,197,共9页Journal of South-Central Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“当代中国的案件事实认定法定主义倾向及治理研究”(16BFX092)。

摘　　要：证据法学历经几百年发展,虽已成为法学的一个部门学科,但其一直囿于与证据学概念混同的沼泽之中。作为法学的一个部门,证据法学应该拥有特定的研究对象、研究方法及独特的学科理论基础。在研究对象方面,应限定为“证据法律规范”,即约束和规制整个诉讼活动的全部证据规则集合体;在研究方法方面,应针对证据法规范本身及其延伸领域,分别采用诠释学、哲学、历史学、社会学等研究方法;在学科理论基础方面,应设定为以“价值论”为核心的多元理论基础。唯如此,才能构建起科学合理的证据法学学科体系,并为证据立法实践提供有效支持。Evidence law has developed for hundreds of years.Although it has become a branch of law science,it has been confined to the swamp confused with the concept of evidence science.As a branch of law,evidence law should have specific research objects and research methods,and a unique theoretical basis of the discipline.That is,in terms of research objects,it should be limited to“legal norms of evidence”and its extended fields,including the philosophical principles,historical origins,forms and practical effects of the norms of evidence law;in terms of research methods,it should be limited to hermeneutic methods,philosophical methods,historical methods,sociological methods correspondently;in terms of the theoretical basis of the discipline,“multiple theories”with value theory as the core should be set as the basis.Only in this way can we build a scientific and reasonable disciplinary system of evidence law and provide effective support for the practice of evidence legislation.

关 键 词：证据法学 证据学 学科分类 学科理念 证据立法 

分 类 号：D925.113[政治法律—诉讼法学]