基于法律文书语料库的数词“二”与“两”用法差异分析  

Analysis of usage differences of numerals“er”(二)and“liang”(两)on the basis of legal instrument corpus

作　　者：孙佳 SUN Jia(School of Literature,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 102488,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学文学院,北京102488

出　　处：《鲁东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第1期61-67,共7页Ludong University Journal:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家语委“十三五”科研规划2020年度重点项目(全球中文学习联盟研究专项)“面向国际中文教育的文本可读性智能评价方法研究及分析系统构建”(ZD1135-141)。

摘　　要：“二”和“两”的用法差异研究一直被学者关注,但以往大多是基于定性的研究,而针对特定领域的研究还不够深入。“二”和“两”在两个语料库的使用存在较大差异,法律语言须准确详细描述事实,多使用数词“二”,体现了法律语言的精准性;法律文书中注重细节描写,常用“数词+量词”这种搭配,且“二”和“两”有相对明确的分工,在选择量词时有固定倾向,而国家语委语料库中,“二”和“两”在选择量词时相对自由,体现了法律语言的稳定性;此外,法律语料库中更倾向于使用省略量词的说法,映射出法律语言的简洁性。The studies of usage differences between“er”(二)and“liang”(两)have been concerned by scholars,but most of them are based on the qualitative method,and the study aimed at specific areas is not deep enough.There exist great differences of the two characters'usage in the two corpora.Legal language must describe the facts accurately and elaborately,and more numerals are used,reflecting the accuracy of legal language.Legal instruments pay attention to detailed description and often use the“numeral+quantifier”collocation,there is a relatively clear division of labor between“er”(二)and“liang”(两),and there is a fixed tendency to choose quantifiers.But in the corpus of National Language Commission,“er”(二)and“liang"(两)are relatively free when choosing quantifiers,reflecting the stability of legal language.Besides,the legal corpus tends to use the statement of ellipsis of quantifiers,which reflects the simplicity of legal language.

关 键 词：“二” “两” 用法差异 法律文书 语料库 

分 类 号：H08[语言文字—语言学]