检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高斌[1] 施晓光[2] 孙宏玉[3] GAO Bin;SHI Xiaoguang;SUN Hongyu(Ministry of Education,Beijing 100816;Peking University,Beijing 10087l;Peking University,Bejing100191)
机构地区:[1]教育部高等教育司农林医药科教育处,北京100816 [2]北京大学教育学院,北京100871 [3]北京大学护理学院,北京100191
出 处:《中国高教研究》2022年第11期75-80,共6页China Higher Education Research
摘 要:基于支持联盟框架理论,对我国临床医学专业认证制度的相关联盟及其信仰系统进行解析,进而解读临床医学专业认证制度的发展历程,并阐释其制度变迁逻辑。研究发现,我国临床医学专业认证制度受外部政策干预以及各支持联盟政策取向学习的影响,经历临床医学专业认证制度的引入、确立与发展、巩固与完善三个阶段。我国临床医学专业认证制度发展是政府联盟、学术联盟和高校联盟三者互动与合力推动的结果,其中学术权威向政府权威演变贯穿临床医学专业认证制度发展历程;支持联盟政策学习和认知水平的提升促进了临床医学专业认证制度的确立和发展。Based on the theory of support alliance framework, this study analyzes the related alliances and their belief systems of the clinical medical professional accreditation system, and then the process of the transition of the clinical medical professional accreditation system and the logic of its system transition are explained. This study found that under the influence of external policy intervention and the policy-oriented learning of each support alliance, the clinical medical professional accreditation system in China has experienced three stages: introduction,establishment and development, and consolidation and improvement. The development of clinical medical professional accreditation system in China is the result of the interaction and joint efforts of government alliance,academic alliance and university alliance, and evolution from academic authority to government authority runs through the development process of the clinical medical professional accreditation system. The policy learning and cognitive enhancement of the support alliance have promoted the establishment and development of the clinical medical professional accreditation system.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145