认知视角下“名词_(1)+指示词+名词_(2)”构式的汉日对比  

A Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Constructions of "Noun_(1)+Demonstrative+Noun_(2)" from a Cognitive Perspective

作　　者：陈曦[1] 牛迎春 Chen Xi;Niu Yingchun

机构地区：[1]西安外国语大学日本文化经济学院,陕西西安710128 [2]西安外国语大学研究生院,陕西西安710128

出　　处：《东北亚外语研究》2023年第1期36-49,共14页Foreign Language Research in Northeast Asia

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“日语复合动词习得的多视阈研究”(17XYY028)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：本文聚焦汉日语言中的指示词构式“名词_(1)+指示词+名词_(2)”,从构式义角度分析表处所、时间和领属三种空间语义的关系。研究发现,构式义在表现言者主观性程度上存在不一致性,而语义层面的不一致性与认知隐喻模式的不同相关。从构式用法角度区分构式为现场指示、上下文照应、记忆指示三种用法,并以现场指示用法为例厘清汉日语言构式的使用倾向,认为其倾向的差异与不同语言使用者的认知主观性及标记模式相关。This paper focuses on the construction of demonstrative words"noun_(1)+demonstrative word+noun_(2)"in Chinese and Japanese languages.From the perspective of constructional meaning,the three spatial semantic relations of place,time and belonging are analyzed in detail,and it is found that constructional meaning is inconsistent in the degree of subjectivity of the speaker,and the inconsistency at the semantic level is related to different cognitive metaphor modes.From the perspective of construction usage,the constructions are divided into three types of usages:on-the-spot indication,contextual response,and memory indication,and the usage of on-the-spot indication is used as an example to clarify the specific pragmatic usage tendencies of Chinese and Japanese language constructions.The research shows that the cognitive subjectivity of users is related to the marking mode.

关 键 词：指示词 汉日对比 构式 认知语言学 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]