检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王成远[1] 张振宇[1] 徐佳音[1] 潘珺俊[1] WANG Chengyuan;ZHANG Zhenyu;XU Jiayin;PAN Junjun(Tuina Department,Wangjing Hospital,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100102,China)
机构地区:[1]中国中医科学院望京医院特色诊疗部推拿科,北京100102
出 处:《中国中医药现代远程教育》2023年第6期38-40,共3页Chinese Medicine Modern Distance Education of China
基 金:北京中医药大学教育科学研究课题【No.XJYB2068】。
摘 要:目的探索微视频作业教学与传统作业教学对推拿专业学生学习成绩的影响。方法采用随机对照研究的方法,将学生分为实验组(采用微视频作业教学模式)及对照组(采用传统作业教学模式),按照相同教学大纲及教学时间学习1个学期,比较2组学生期末考核成绩(理论考核加实践操作考核),并分别对2组学生进行匿名的学习满意度调查。结果实验组理论考核与实践操作成绩均高于对照组,2组结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组满意度结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论微视频作业教学方式相比传统课后练习对于学生推拿课程的成绩提升有明显优势。Objective To explore the influence of micro-video homework teaching and traditional homework teaching on tuina major.Methods Using the method of RCTS,the students were divided into experimental group(using micro-video homework teaching mode)and control group(using traditional homework teaching mode).They studied for one semester according to the same syllabus and teaching time.The final examination results(theoretical examination and practical operation examination)of the two classes were compared,and the two groups of students were anonymous learning satisfaction survey.Results The results of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the traditional after class exercises,the micro-video homework teaching method has obvious advantages in improving the students’performance of massage course.
分 类 号:R-4[医药卫生] G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30