《性自命出》的性情论——兼论其与孟子性善论的关系  

The Theory of Nature in Nature Originates from the Mandate——On its Relationship with Mencius’s Theory of Good Nature

作　　者：张伯宇 ZHANG Bo-yu

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学文学院,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《闽南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2022年第4期75-79,共5页Journal of Minnan Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences

摘　　要：《性自命出》与“思孟学派”的关系,在学界未成定论,仍有待从人性论、修养论进行更深刻细腻的较论。心、性、情的相关论述,是儒家哲理作为“生命学问”的意义基础,也是朱子建立孔、孟学统的依据。《性自命出》以丰富、细致的概念,撑起了早于孟子学说的儒家性情论架构;但孟子性善论明确的人文抉择与宣示,却是《性自命出》付之阙如的大义。就思想观念发展来说,孟子性善论可说是《性自命出》性情论的进一步发展。但二者在具体工夫修养论的差异,显示了在没有其他有力考证的情况下,不能直接肯定彼此的传承关系。The relationship between Nature Originates from the Mandateand the"Si-meng School"has not been finalized in the academic world,so it still needs to be discussed in a more profound and detailed way from the theory of human nature and the theory of self-cultivation.The relevant statements of mind,nature and emotion are the basis of Confucian philosophy as"life knowledge",and the basis for Zhu Xi to establish the Confucian academic system.With rich and detailed concepts,the book sup‐ports the framework of the Confucian theory of temperament earlier than Mencius,but Mencius's clear humanistic choice and declaration of his theory on good nature is the main significance absentin the book.In terms of the development of ideology,Men‐cius's theory of good nature can be declared to be the further development of the theory of nature and emotion in the book.How‐ever,the difference between them in the theory of specific time and cultivation shows that without more powerful textual re‐search,we can not directly confirm the inheritance relationship between them.

关 键 词：性自命出 性善论 思孟学派 儒学 乐教 

分 类 号：H13[语言文字—汉语]