检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹淑琼 陶洁[2] 袁联雄[2] 李贝 ZOU Shu-qiong;TAO Jie;YUAN Lian-xiong;LI Bei(School of Health Management,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China;The Third Affiliated Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510630,China)
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学卫生管理学院,广东广州510515 [2]中山大学附属第三医院,广东广州510630
出 处:《现代药物与临床》2022年第12期2885-2890,共6页Drugs & Clinic
基 金:广东省科技创新战略专项资金(广东省基础与应用基础研究基金自然科学基金)项目(2020A1515011134);广州市哲学社会科学规划2020年度共建课题(2020GZGJ130)。
摘 要:目的 构建基于质量管理体系要求ISO9001:2015的药物临床试验机构的质量管理评价体系。方法 采用专家调查法邀请14名专家进行2轮咨询,确定各级指标,使用层次分析法计算各指标的权重。结果 建立了4个一级指标、15个二级指标和46个三级指标的药物临床试验机构质量管理评价体系;一级指标领导与策划、支持与运行、效果评估、持续改进的权重分别为0.210 3、0.330 3、0.183 5、0.275 9;二级指标中组合权重排前3位的分别为预防和纠正(0.155 4)、领导力(0.114 3)、机构定期开展质控检查(0.080 6);三级指标中组合权重排前3位的为定期进行预防和纠正效果评估(0.069 6)、有对应的数据或举措体现改进效果(0.048 7)、具有药物临床试验质量管理要求和指引(0.037 8)。结论 构建的质量管理评价体系具有一定的科学性、实用性,可用于评估药物临床试验机构的质量管理能力。Objective To establish the quality management evaluation systems for drug clinical trial institutions based on ISO9001:2015. Methods Using the Delphi method, 14 experts will be invited to conduct two rounds of consultation to determine the indicators at all levels, and the weight of each indicator will be calculated using the analytic hierarchy process. Results A quality management evaluation system for drug clinical trial institutions was established with 4 first-level indicators, 15 second-level indicators, and 46third-level indicators. The weights of leadership and planning, support and operation, effect evaluation, and continuous improvement of the first-level indicators are 0.210 3, 0.330 3, 0.183 5, and 0.275 9, respectively. The top three combined weights in the second-level indicators are prevention and correction(0.155 4), leadership(0.114 3), and the institution regularly conducts quality control inspections(0.080 6). Among the three-level indicators, the top three in combination weights are regularly evaluated for preventive and corrective effects(0.069 6), with corresponding data or measures to reflect the improvement effect(0.048 7), and with requirements and guidelines for quality management of drug clinical trials(0.037 8). Conclusion The established quality management evaluation systems is scientific and practical, which can be used to evaluate the quality management ability of drug clinical trial institutions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.8.255